adrienmundi: (Default)
adrienmundi ([personal profile] adrienmundi) wrote2003-02-10 09:46 am

(no subject)

To pick up in the same neighborhood as before, if not the same address:

Not knowing things really bugs me; I don't know that I've ever outgrown that toddleresque demand of "Why?". I suspect that it's only been compounded with age, as I become more aware of that I do not know as I learn more. I don't think I want to know everything, just everything in which I am interested (only the tiniest of differences, practically). In a way, I think this ties into the "rules" discussion; not knowing the social landscape, the bounds and penalties, makes me unsettled, for the previously discussed reasons, as well as the whole just not knowing.

This retreat to conservative possibilities is ceasing to serve, I think. I keep having the nagging feeling that I'm missing out on something, or potentially something, and really have no one to blame for this but myself. I don't think it's just hesitation; if I don't know the lay of things, I often don't know how to proceed, no matter how I may want to. It becomes something that nags at me, this desire for more/better/different, with little navigational assistance that I can find. I envy greatly those who seem to navigate by some internal sense, and who seem to misstep substantially less than I think I do (I'm willing to grant that, not being privy to the internal dialogues, it may be all appearance). There are people with whom I want to be closer, those already close with whom I want interactions to be richer, and the one with whom I want them to be clear and unfiltered. I'm greedy, I guess, and impatient.

[identity profile] skiadaimonos.livejournal.com 2003-02-10 10:25 am (UTC)(link)
You see where this whole 'grounding' thing comes in now? Also, the question of whether these are theoretical solliloquies or actual dialogical efforts--
Are you just interested in diagnosing/describing the inner workings of your reality? If so, you have succeeded quite accurately, and you have been succeeding (more or less accurately) for quite some time now. But unless all you want to do is make a (granted, clarified) entrenched "what is" and "this is who I am" statement, something more has to happen. And, to stick to your own wording from above, reconciling 'logical accuracy' with "feeling" seems to be what needs to be worked on. Just because something sounds reasonable and you can find no real 'flaw' by which to tear it down, it does not follow that it will immediately infuse your reality. The process of accepting is soemtimes much harder than discovering (if that makes any sense). But do not embrace that reluctance ("humility"/"fear of hubris"/whatever) too tightly-- it is not synonymous with "hesitation and wandering."

Look at this as a scene unfolding, where 'you' have no specific stake at the moment of watching: Person A seems to think that person B 'flows' eloquently through life, while A feels awkward, undirected, whatever. But person A will more than likely seem to flow pretty nicely as well to person C (who in turn fdeels awkward/whatever). And in all that, it is almost guaranteed that, at least in some point in time and in some situations, person B will look at person C (and person A and person whoever) and think "woa... they sure do have their shit togeter.... now why can't I be like that"
Lesson? We are all at times competent, at times incompetent, may feel totally in tune or totally out of whack from one moment to the next. None of that makes us less or more worthy of, or (il)legitimates quests and claims to happiness.

Re:

[identity profile] skiadaimonos.livejournal.com 2003-02-11 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
relate to specific experiential instances, i think...
I'd be willing to guess that you do not have the same power relations with everyone, the same levels and kinds of uncertainty with everyone and at diferent situations etc. Seems important that these are identified and mined.

[identity profile] skiadaimonos.livejournal.com 2003-02-10 12:19 pm (UTC)(link)
oh yea
what i wanted to say in reality, and got sidetracked with all the rest of that stuff

The above is noot a matter of feeling or logic as much as it is data