ext_365367 ([identity profile] fairyhead.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] adrienmundi 2009-10-19 08:44 pm (UTC)

Even if there are people doing really bad things, what makes you qualified to determine what life gets taken? While I can see the urge, I think that's skirting on an arrogance that's very unhealthy. Plus, you've got to do the math around whether or not you could really succeed at it and the repercussions of when you get caught and the repercussions for and to your loved ones. In all likelihood, you'd only get one 'rich fucker' then go to jail for forever. There are bunches of that ilk to take his or her place. What does that accomplish? You'd be viewed as an anomaly and no one would be scared or change their ways. You'd probably do better to work on ways of helping those afflicted by the 'rich fuckers'. If you really want to help those people, think about what would empower them the most. Literacy? Job skills? Education? Food? Adequate medical care?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting