Perspective

[adrienmundi]

Then:

Sex isn't really possible for me unless there's at least one girl involved.

Now:

Sex isn't even remotely likely unless there's at least one "girl" and no "boys" involved.

Do note the differences; they feel huge to me.

Comments

[martinhesselius.livejournal.com]

Interesting!
Er, answer in e-mail or IM if you wish -
self-identity as 'boi' or 'girl'?

[fairyhead.livejournal.com]

Dang it all! We do need to figure out how to do that Vulcan Mind Meld thing. That way I can see me as you see me - *and* you can see how notboy you really are. :-X

and from a bonobo's eye view

[skiadaimonos.livejournal.com]

Then:
Sex something'nt something something something something something something's something something.

Now:
Sex something't something soemthing something "something" something "something" something.

Damn them chimps... got it so much easier

A random passerby goes off topic

[gurdonark.livejournal.com]

I know that the topic is sex/boi/boy/girl/grrl/remotely likely.
I apologize in advance for failing to be a well-mannered random visitor who either forbears to comment until a less intimate
topic came up, or who merely forbears to comment at all.
But tonight I did an exercise in "search Livejournal"
which I think I'll share.

I played the "imagine users" game. First, I imagined
someone was named "helpless", and sure enough, I hit
someone named 'helpless', with a post last July about
the shortcomings of a boy.

Then I tried "helpful". Sorry, no users.

How about "helper"? Again, no users.

Then I hit on "feckless". Here you were, on the conditions
of intimacy with a boy, a girl, or not.

I am intrigued that nobody is helper or helpful,
but feckless and helpless are well represented.

Back to surfing now, and have a good weekend (grin).