Perspective
Apr. 17th, 2002 10:54 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Then:
Sex isn't really possible for me unless there's at least one girl involved.
Now:
Sex isn't even remotely likely unless there's at least one "girl" and no "boys" involved.
Do note the differences; they feel huge to me.
Sex isn't really possible for me unless there's at least one girl involved.
Now:
Sex isn't even remotely likely unless there's at least one "girl" and no "boys" involved.
Do note the differences; they feel huge to me.
no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 12:14 am (UTC)Er, answer in e-mail or IM if you wish -
self-identity as 'boi' or 'girl'?
no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 06:24 am (UTC)Oddly, though I normally do not feel terribly male, I normally don't want to avoid being a boi, but would rather have the option of being boi/grrl/so many other things at whim. But though I may play a Bard on TV, I don't come equipped with Celtic shapechanging powers, alas, so my desires for a fluid identity remain largely in my thoughts. 'Fantastical,' as it were, in several senses of the word.
no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-04-18 07:00 am (UTC)and from a bonobo's eye view
Date: 2002-04-18 06:42 am (UTC)Sex something'nt something something something something something something's something something.
Now:
Sex something't something soemthing something "something" something "something" something.
Damn them chimps... got it so much easier
Re: and from a bonobo's eye view
Date: 2002-04-18 06:59 am (UTC)Re: and from a bonobo's eye view
Date: 2002-04-18 02:04 pm (UTC)Re: and from a bonobo's eye view
Date: 2002-04-18 08:59 am (UTC)A random passerby goes off topic
I apologize in advance for failing to be a well-mannered random visitor who either forbears to comment until a less intimate
topic came up, or who merely forbears to comment at all.
But tonight I did an exercise in "search Livejournal"
which I think I'll share.
I played the "imagine users" game. First, I imagined
someone was named "helpless", and sure enough, I hit
someone named 'helpless', with a post last July about
the shortcomings of a boy.
Then I tried "helpful". Sorry, no users.
How about "helper"? Again, no users.
Then I hit on "feckless". Here you were, on the conditions
of intimacy with a boy, a girl, or not.
I am intrigued that nobody is helper or helpful,
but feckless and helpless are well represented.
Back to surfing now, and have a good weekend (grin).