disingenuous
Mar. 29th, 2006 09:31 amThere was a thread started on one of my regular political blog reads* about whether "men" should use the label feminist. The post initiator appeared to be agreeing with the position that maybe it's not a good idea for "men" to claim the label due to lack of first hand experience. Because I'm genuinely curious, I asked:
how, if at all, is the feminist monicker informed by any number of trans identities and issues? Is a transguy still capable of being a legitimate feminist due to the experience living as assigned female? Does passing as male in any way dilute one’s claim to the label? Are transwomen eligible to be feminists at any point? Is the legitimacy of the claim based on self-definition, on socially assigned definitions, some combination of the two, or something else entirely?
The poster is self-defined as a transguy, so it seemed valid and possibly illuminating. But, there's something in phrasing of the questions for understandability that felt... bad, to me. If I intentionally use language as a rhetorical stance that discourages the consideration of nonbinary options, am I participating in my own erasure? This raises the related question for me of how I can participate in the feminist struggle even though many of the fundaments seem problematic in relation to me personally. I feel dirty, and don't know how to get rid of that feeling.
*feministe, if you're interested
how, if at all, is the feminist monicker informed by any number of trans identities and issues? Is a transguy still capable of being a legitimate feminist due to the experience living as assigned female? Does passing as male in any way dilute one’s claim to the label? Are transwomen eligible to be feminists at any point? Is the legitimacy of the claim based on self-definition, on socially assigned definitions, some combination of the two, or something else entirely?
The poster is self-defined as a transguy, so it seemed valid and possibly illuminating. But, there's something in phrasing of the questions for understandability that felt... bad, to me. If I intentionally use language as a rhetorical stance that discourages the consideration of nonbinary options, am I participating in my own erasure? This raises the related question for me of how I can participate in the feminist struggle even though many of the fundaments seem problematic in relation to me personally. I feel dirty, and don't know how to get rid of that feeling.
*feministe, if you're interested