adrienmundi: (Default)
[personal profile] adrienmundi
If conceptual inclusion is a human right, and gender is used to conceptually exclude many people, wouldn't questioning gender itself be a logical place to begin, rather than changing the definitions?

You present a gender continuum as a solution to the either/or only model of binary gender, but don't you see how any linear model like a continuum necessarily privileges the extremes as absolute and definitional?

You speak of the failure of moral imagination, and then go on to say that you cannot envision social life without gender; couldn't this be a case of the failure of your own moral imagination?




*To David Ozar, bioethicist, who spoke at Agnes Scott on "A Basic Human Right to Conceptual Inclusion: Bringing Transgender and Intersex Persons into Our Thinking"
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

adrienmundi: (Default)
adrienmundi

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 12:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios